Use of Different Modified Dual Piezo Cnfigurations on RC Beam using EMI Technique

S. N. Khante, Saurabh M. Bhoir

Abstract


Real time structural health monitoring along with damage detection and assessment of reinforced con-crete members becomes vital since engineers often face the problem of detecting hidden damage. The Electromechanical Impedance (EMI) technique, which uses piezoelectric–ceramic Lead–Zirconate–Titanate (PZT) patches as impedance trans-ducers, has emerged as a powerful non-destructive evaluation technique during the last few decades. Conventional EMI tech-nique employs the same piezo patch as the sensor as well as the actuator. A new version of piezo configurations is used here is called as Modified Dual Piezo Configuration (MDPC). It is applied in such a way that central patch acts as sensor and surrounding patches acts as actuator yielding to better results and larger sensing zone. In present work performance of different piezo configurations, namely, surface-bonded Single Piezo Configuration (SPC), surface-bonded Modified Dual Piezo Configuration (MDPC) and Embedded Modified Dual Piezo Configurations (EMDPC) are applied to three different but identical reinforced concrete beams which are then subjected to destructive loading condition and tested. RMSD indices are evaluated and their results are compared for effectiveness of all configurations using EMI technique. It is establi hed that MDPC detects damage most effectively.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Park G, Sohn H, Farrar CR, Inman DJ (2003) ”Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward”. Shock Vibr Dig 35(6):451–463.

Shanker R, Bhalla S and Gupta A (2010) ”Integration ofelectro- http://www.celindia.co.in

mechanical impedance and global dynamic technique for improved truc- [12] Keysight Technologies (2016) LCR meters and impedance measurement

tural health monitoring”. Journal of Intelligent Material Sy tems and products. Available at: http://www.keysight.com

Structures 21(2): 285–295.

Khante, S.N. and Gedam, S.R. (2016) ” PZT Based Smart Aggregate

for Unified Health Monitoring of RC Structures”. Open Journal of Civil

Engineering, 6, 42-49.

Song, G.B., Gu, H.C. and Mo, Y.-L. (2008) ”Smart Aggregates: Multi-

Functional Sensors for Concrete Structures—A Tutorial and a Review”.

Smart Materials and Structures, 17.

Negi, P., Kaur, N., Bhalla, S. and Chakraborty, T. (2014) ”Experimental

Strain Sensitivity Investigations on Embedded PZT Patches in Varying

Orientations”. Proceedings of 9th Biennial Conference on Structural

Engineering Convention (SEC 2014), New Delhi, 22-24 December 2014,

-2620.

Visalakshi, T. and Bhalla, S. (2014) ”Reinforcement Corrosion Assess-

ment Capability of Surface Bonded and Embedded Piezo Sensors for RC

Structures”. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 26,

-2313.

Liang C, un FP, Rogers CA (1994) ”Coupled electro-mechanical analysis

of adaptive material systems-determination of the actuator power con-

sumption and system energy transfer”. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 5:12–20.

ong H, Lim HJ, ohn H (2013) ”Electromechanical impedance measure-

ment from large structures using a dual piezoelectric transducer”. Journal

of ound and Vibration 332:6580–6595.

Adhikari and Bhalla S (2018) ”A modified dual piezo configuration

for improved structural health monitoring”. Experimental Techniques.

February 2018, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 25–40.

Kaur N, Li LF, Bhalla S, et al. (2017) ”Integration and evaluation of multiple piezo configurations for optimal health monitoring of RC structures”. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures.

Central Electronics Limited (CEL) (2016) Available at:http://www.celindia.co.in

Keysight Technologies (2016) LCR meters and impedance measurement

products. Available at: http://www.keysight.com


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © IJETT, International Journal on Emerging Trends in Technology